The repo, readable by everyone.
Cedric summarizes issues, pull requests and repository activity in plain words, and files the issue the thread just agreed on.
$50 in free credits when you sign up. No card needed.
- Half the team cannot read the repo, so engineering status travels by interruption.
- Cedric summarizes issues, pull requests and activity in plain words, for any window you name.
- The bug described in the thread becomes a properly filed issue, links included, on your yes.
- Waiting reviews and stalled pull requests get named before they get expensive.
- The daily dev digest posts itself, and nobody had to run a standup to get it.
What can a GitHub AI agent do?
In most companies the repository is where the truth lives and where only engineers can read it. Everyone else learns what shipped by asking, which is why engineers get interrupted and why status meetings exist. A GitHub AI agent tears that wall down: ask Cedric what happened in the repo this week and the answer comes back in plain words, merges, open reviews, new issues, with the notable ones called out.
Filing is the other half. Bugs get discovered in conversation, described once, and lost. When the thread agrees something is broken, Cedric turns it into a proper issue, the description, the reproduction, the links back to the discussion, and files it on your yes. The distance between 'someone should file that' and a filed issue becomes one approval.
What an AI employee changes here is who gets to know. Support can check whether the fix landed without pinging a developer; a founder can read the week's engineering in thirty seconds. The repo keeps its gate; the wall around its information comes down. For the fuller story, see what that does to a development team.
The weekly read
What happened in the repo, without the standup.
Tomás Rivera9:14 AM
@Cedric what happened in the repo this week?
CedricAPP9:15 AM
23 commits, 6 pull requests merged, 2 open. The payment-retry fix landed Tuesday and closed #412. Still open: the rate-limiter PR, waiting on Kevin's review since Wednesday, and the dashboard refactor, still draft. One thing worth eyes: an intermittent CI timeout, three occurrences since Monday. I can file it as an issue with the three run links attached.
Summarized
Issues, pull requests and activity in plain words, for any window, with the notable named.
Filed
The bug from the thread becomes a proper issue with links and context, on your yes.
For everyone
Non-engineers get repo answers without learning the repo, and engineers stop being the API.
Connect GitHub in a minute
No setup project, no workflow builder, no field mapping. The flow is the same for every tool Cedric connects to.
- 01
Install Cedric where your team talks
One click. It joins your Slack like any other member, and everyone shares the same Cedric.
- 02
Connect GitHub from the dashboard
Open the Integrations page and sign in with GitHub on its own screen. Cedric never sees or stores your password, and you can revoke the connection in one click at any time.
A fresh connection can look but not touch: read-only until you say otherwise.
- 03
Ask in plain words
Back in the channel, try it: "summarize this week's pull requests". You describe the outcome; Cedric picks the GitHub actions the ask needs. There is nothing to configure.
Connect for the whole workspace so the team shares it, or keep the connection personal. Two accounts are fine too; each gets a short name.
- 04
Let it become routine
Schedule the recurring version of the ask, and let Cedric fold GitHub into bigger jobs that cross your other tools. Anything that would leave your workspace still comes back as a preview to approve first.
Better in company
The repo tells you what changed; Linear tells you what was planned, and Cedric reading both is how 'are we on track' gets an honest answer. Add Notion and the spec can be checked against what the code now actually does.
Plan, code, and doc, cross-read by one assistant: drift gets caught in a thread instead of a retro.
Where the limits are
Cedric reads, summarizes, and files; it does not merge. Reviews, merges, and releases stay engineering decisions made by engineers. The wall between the team and the repo's information comes down; the gate on the code stays exactly where it was.
Cedric sees what the GitHub connection grants and nothing more. Access is scoped, logged, and revocable from the dashboard, effective immediately.
Nothing sends itself. An email, a post, a change to a record: anything with consequences comes back as a preview for a human yes. That is the design, not a beta caveat.
FAQ
Yes, natively. GitHub is one of the apps Cedric knows deeply, with a built-in playbook: connect it once from the dashboard and ask in plain words, with no workflow to build and no fields to map. It sits alongside 3,200+ other connectable apps.
Yes. It drafts the issue from what the thread established, description, reproduction, links, and files it when you approve. What was heading for oblivion becomes tracked work in one yes.
That is half the point. 'Did the export fix ship?' is answerable by anyone in the channel now, in plain words, without interrupting whoever wrote the fix.
Yes: schedule it and the digest posts on cadence, merges, reviews waiting, new issues, the same shape every day. Standup information without the standup.
Connect it for the whole workspace and everyone shares it, with one person authorising once. A connection you would rather not share, a personal inbox for instance, can stay personal to you.
Yes, and it starts that way: a fresh connection can look but not touch until you say otherwise. Even with write access granted, anything that changes or sends waits for an approval.
Every workspace starts with $50 in credits, free, no card. Each task consumes credits in proportion to the work involved. See pricing for the plans.
Open the repo to the whole team.
Install Cedric, connect GitHub, and let the week's engineering explain itself.
100K credits ($50) on sign up. No card needed.